Advantages Of Standard Mouse

Stefano Moracci

The servant of U.S. interests, the so-called left has always been silent on those who are really upset the constitutional arrangements.

Prima di entrare nel merito della questione faccio una parentesi. Il comunista (sic!) Paolo Ferrero, dal suo blog ,non parla più di difesa della costituzione, ma di attuazione della costituzione. Non deve sfuggire a nessuno il cambio di rotta. 

Non voglio perderci più di tanto tempo, ma solo per dire che siamo in fase di sorprese.
Ritornando alle cose serie. Le leggi che hanno stravolto l'assetto istituzionale, come denunciano i sinistri falsi e ipocriti, che sarebbero state fatte da Berlusconi, sono state attuate anni prima e ulteriori modifiche  preparate nel 1992 (anno decisivo for the new capitalist mode of production then called globalization, which just happened to coincide well with clean hands, coincides well with the Amato government supported by the left).

But let order.

institutional review standards, which were not considered as true reform is to be considered the law reforming the Council Presidency of 1988, the reform of local self- and the amendment of factual accounts of the State (which continuously are reported and attributed to the Berlusconi government takes upon itself as the legislative decrees approving laws that do not have financial coverage) the reform of parliamentary rules on the public vote to oppose the so-called "snipers" and preserving the programmatic agreement between the parties of the majority.

Always open vote was voted the reform of broadcasting, the limitation of the right to strike in public education, the reform of administrative procedure. As well as the voting ballot has been used on the issue of trust in government.

Everything has been prepared on a silver platter to Berlusconi ahead.
But what is interesting is the debate that in 1992, two years before the "drop-down field" of Berlusconi, on institutional reforms themselves, ie those that directly affect the functions of government. If someone pays a little attention will notice that everything seems to be contemplated and prepared according to the descent in the field of Berlusconi.

We said that in 1992, while the populist Di Pietro was in the throes of scandal, a trend that you were discussing was the principle of so-called functional majoritarianism. What is it? It 'a principle which involves creating a set of rules that serve the majority to implement his program: these are proposals, such as that of the government term, which remain within the framework of a parliamentary democracy. In fact, by doing so, the parliament (the legislative body) remains a prisoner of the government (executive).

The second strand is the most interesting. We are always in 1992. What is debate? The so-called majoritarianism composition or structural and provides for the reform of the electoral system through the identification of technical tools to facilitate the formation of coalitions with a relative majority (direct election of the executive or the President of the Council).
Perfect.

who prepared all the equipment that will help Berlusconi?

Guess who was there in 1992 the government?
Those who speak in defense of the "Constitution born of the Resistance" after you have ignored for years and then adjusted according to the descent into the field of Berlusconi, should have a very special treatment.
We would like to know the intellectual labor of Ferrero, who led him to abandon the defense of the constitution and embrace the implementation of the constitution.